Science Proves Mysticism

Einstein made one of the most important observations that modern intellectuals neither understand, nor can they in any manner even begin to come to terms with.   Einstein stated: "The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift."   Thus, the question? If Einstein is correct, then how does one set about developing the intuitive mind?   Does one go to a traditional school environment that suppresses what Einstein portrays as the forgotten intuitive gift -- while programming the rational servant with what often amounts to little more than cultural and politically correct propaganda?   With great wisdom and vision Einstein stated "Only those who can see the invisible can do the impossible."    But since the vast majority of modern scientists reject even the existence of the invisible -- promoting the position that only what you see with your physical senses is tangible and real -- it is the mainstream of the scientific community that has rendered itself impotent with respect to any real depth of perception and understanding.   And from the religious side of the equation, the man known as the Apostle Paul conveyed the exact same message to the congregation of believers that Einstein stated in the words:  "While we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen: for the things which are seen are temporal; but the things which are not seen are eternal" (2 Cor 4:18 KJV) -- even going so far at to portray the literal perception of the scriptures which is championed by linear-thinking religious authorities, as the "letter that killeth" (2 Cor 3:6).   Thus, provoking the question: Is it possible to see beyond the limits of man's organic vision, and intuitively observe that which is unseen by the mind of natural organic man?

In his own words Einstein acknowledged that: “The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education.”     In fact, what Einstein portrays as the rational servant does not even possess the necessary insight to understand both the reality of the intuitive gift, or the Great Source of Knowledge that the undeveloped intuitive resources of the mind of man has the innate potential of tapping into -- which prompted Einstein to acknowledge that “We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.”  

To man's own detriment, the above statements are largely ignored by the vast majority of linear-thinking scientists and their religious counterparts.   Thus, the all-important question that modern man must come to terms with: Does an unseen dimension exist that the (suppressed) Intuitive Mind can tap into and obtain answers and important truths that the linear-intellectual mind is blind to?   And if it does, what course of action must we take to develop the ability to perceive and tap into the unseen?   If it is true that we are only seeing a very partial and fragmentary vision of our own true reality -- and it is within the scope of man's innate abilities to develop this facility of mind that enables the individual to perceive an unseen reality that is beyond the limits of man's undeveloped physical organic senses -- then how can we continue to ignore and do what suppresses the development of this important resource of mind and being?   With respect to the invisible, when it is understood that what is being made reference to is a blindness that encompasses all of mankind in a condition that Jesus portrayed as the "outer darkness" of mind and being (see Outer Darkness) -- which is parallel to the analogy of the illusions of Plato's Cave that has entrapped mankind in a shadow-world that he does not understand the nature and reality of -- then the reality of these words spoken by both the scientist and the mystic becomes an obstacle that is imperative to overcome and prevail over its limitations.    After all, we can't claim to know or understand anything, if we have so limited our vision of reality that we only see and observe a fragmentary perception of man's true reality. 

The vast difference between what would be called the common knowledge of man, and the higher spiritual reality attested to by the mystic and visionary of man's distant past, has begun to be demonstrated by the modern scientific community.    Quoting physicist Walter Thirring in his book, Urbausteine der Materie where he wrote about matter that modern physics “...has put our thinking about the essence of matter in a different context.   It has taken our gaze from the visible - the particles - to the underlying entity, the field.   The presence of matter is merely a disturbance of the perfect state of the field at that place; something accidental, one could almost say, a ‘blemish’.   Accordingly, there are no simple laws describing the forces between elementary particles… Order and symmetry must be sought in the underlying field.”   One of the primary realities that science has yet to come to terms with in order to advance beyond their present level, is the fact that physical matter is the result of the forces in the Etheric Field coming together -- causing what Walter Thirring above describes as a "blemish" that we observe with our organic physical senses.   And what this is, is in fact Darwinism in reverse -- i.e., modern science has proven that the Field which is unseen and surrounds all matter, is in fact the Source which impresses the aspect of mind and consciousness into the forms of matter that we observe with our physical senses.    But it will remain impossible for us to even begin to understand with any depth of comprehension what we see, so long as our vision remains alienated from the Source in the Field that is the causal factor. 

What man has traditionally called knowledge, is the wisdom and understanding gained through his study of what Walter Thirring called the "blemish" -- i.e., the illusion of what we perceive as physical matter.    What exactly is the physicist portraying as a "blemish"?  Man in his "natural" organic condition of mind can only see and understand from a three-dimensional perspective of reality -- and this causes the (shadow-images) of what man sees with his physical senses, to be an allegorical image that is representative of the (unseen) whole.   This (allegorical) shadow-image is formed by the intersecting forces (positive/negative, male/female) in what the scientist has portrayed as the unseen (Etheric) Field.    Therefore, without understanding the underlying forces in the Field that formed the "blemish" that organic man observes as concrete physical matter, it can be stated that what we observe  in the physical world is so incomplete, that it would be virtually impossible to truly understand what we think and imagine we see.    Which is why the Gospel of Thomas declares: (5) Jesus said, "Recognize what is in your sight, and that which is hidden from you will become plain to you."    

Reality, states the physicist, can only be found in the (unseen Etheric) Field -- and it is the Field that both surrounds all physical forms that we observe with our body-senses -- and it is the unseen Field that is the source of what we perceive with our physical senses which we call matter.   The analogy of Plato portrays what we see as shadow-images, because being three-dimensional and incomplete, they are allegorical in nature -- i.e., a symbol of the higher reality which exists as the Source in the Field.   Which again, must be understood as Darwinism in reverse -- in that, Darwinism attempted to demonstrate that this physical world came into being apart from any unseen supernatural forces -- and modern science has now proven that this world is the direct result of unseen forces that would be defined as supernatural, or beyond what is seen with the physical senses.   Which means that the statement that astrophysicist Robert Jastrow who was the head of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies wrote in his book, God and the Astronomers, has come to pass -- i.e., “The scientist has scaled the mountains of ignorance; he is about to conquer the highest peak; as he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries.”  While modern science has proven the vision of the Mystic to be true, in order for the scientist to move beyond his present position, he must begin to consult and learn from the wisdom of the Mystic that is routinely taught in our modern systems of education.    Therefore, it must be recognized that the allegorical shadow-images that we see in the outer world not only came into existence through the unseen forces in what the scientist portrays as the Field -- but that the shadow-images which we see, is totally dependent upon the Source in the unseen Field.  

In defense of Darwin, it must be understood that in the same way that many unsolved crimes in the past are presently resolved through DNA, Darwin lived in the nineteenth century -- long before the most enlightening discoveries of modern quantum physics.   And in recognition of this fact, Darwin himself questioned the inadequacy of his own conclusions.  In the words of Niles Eldredge of the American Museum of Natural History: “The old explanation that the fossil record was inadequate is in itself an inadequate explanation.”  Why?  The fossil record is inadequate because everything that we see and perceive in this realm is directly caused by patterns of force being exerted upon matter from beyond the bounds of this three-dimensional world in which we presently dwell.  And the fact that the fossil record failed to support Darwin's conclusions, is openly acknowledged in his own words where he wrote: "Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain, and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory" (Charles Darwin, On The Origin Of Species).  According to Darwin's theory, the geological record should be full of species that are slowly increasing in complexity over time.  Since evolution relies on time, chance, and incremental steps, sudden leaps are not possible -- which demonstrates that the fossil record itself directly contradicts the theory of evolution!   And even if a proverbial missing link could be found, this would not in any manner negate the fact that it is the forces in the Etheric Field that has brought about all changes and variations of life-forms that we observe in the physical world.

Einstein experienced shock when he first came into contact with the new reality of atomic physics, and wrote in his autobiography: “All my attempts to adapt the theoretical foundation of physics to this [new type of] knowledge failed completely. It was as if the ground had been pulled out from under one, with no firm foundation to be seen anywhere, upon which one could have built”.  In much the same fashion, the European physicist Niels Bohr stated that “…The great extension of our experience in recent years has brought to light the insufficiency of our simple mechanical conceptions and, as a consequence, has shaken the foundation on which the customary interpretation of observation was based.”   These “…mechanical conceptions” make reference to Darwin and the theory of evolution.  The crux of the problem that has limited man's thinking to that of the intellectual dark ages, is found in the statement that the mind of man sees only what he is prepared to comprehend!   And that what we imagine we see is affected by our own thinking, is demonstrated in text of Itzhak Bentov’s book which reveals that: “The quantum theory asserts that there is no way one can measure some sets of things, like momentum and position, together very accurately... because the consciousness of the experimenter interacts with the experiment itself.  Therefore, it becomes possible that the attitude of the experimenter must also influence the outcome of any particular experiment” (Preface to Stalking The Wild Pendulum, by Itzhak Bentov).   Thus, we begin to contemplate the interrelatedness of mind and matter and the fact that the whole of our culture which is based totally upon a linear perception, is to the exclusion of what is observed and understood by the intuitive.     Thus, resulting in the fact that our linear-based culture has become an obstacle to the advancement of mankind.    

That there is an unseen connection between mind and matter, and man is able to consciously and unconsciously effect what we perceive as inanimate objects with his own patterns of thought, means that our present-day cultural and quasi-scientific perception of Creation itself is defective.  The problem is that we can never start to embrace man’s true reality, until we begin to acknowledge and recognize that what we see is only a fragment of the whole picture of any given object -- and this is true not only from a religious doctrinal perspective, but a scientific one as well.

Robert Jastrow, an astrophysicist who heads NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, pointed out that the big bang is not exactly an explanation of cause.  He is quoted in The Aquarian Conspiracy: “If a scientist really examines the implications, he would be traumatized. As usual, when the mind is faced with trauma, it reacts by ignoring the implications - in science this is called ‘refusing to speculate’ - or by trivializing the origin of the world by calling it the Big Bang, as if the universe were merely a firecracker”.   Mr. Jastrow then continues and states: “Consider the enormousness of the problem: Science has proved that the universe exploded into being at a certain moment. It asks, what cause produced this effect? Who or what put the matter and energy into the universe? Was the universe created out of nothing or was it gathered together out of pre-existing materials? And science cannot answer these questions... It is not a matter of another year, another decade of work, another measurement, or another theory. At this moment it seems as though science will never be able to raise the curtain on the mystery of creation”.

In the realization that traditional scientific inquiry can never provide the answers to life, thoughtful physicists in greater number have begun to notice the curious parallels between their own findings and ancient mystical descriptions of reality -- mystical descriptions that have been totally dismissed by our modern linear-based culture.  These similarities were pointed out in the book, The Tao Of Physics, by Fritjof Capra, and The Dancing Wu Li Masters by Gary Zukav.   Zukav’s book takes its title from the Chinese expression for physics, wu li, which he translates as “patterns of organic energy”, and writes: “Bell’s theorem not only suggests that the world is quite different than it seems, it demands it. Something very exciting is happening. Physicists have ‘proved’ rationally that our rational ideas about the world in which we live are profoundly deficient”.

Bell’s theorem, which was proposed in 1964 by J.S. Bell, a physicist working in Switzerland, was first confirmed experimentally in 1972.  Physicist Henry Stapp, in a 1975 federal report called it the most “profound discovery of science”.  Bell’s theorem succeeds in exhibiting the bizarre nature of the subatomic world.  Experiments show that if paired particles which are identical twins in their polarity fly apart, and the polarity of one is changed by an experimenter, the polarity of the other particle changes instantaneously.  Thus, even though from a physical perspective the two particles appear to us as separate, it has been proven that the particles remain mysteriously connected regardless of the fact that there is no physical connection.  

The esoteric reality that was proven and demonstrated in this experiment was portrayed as the most “profound discovery of science”, because it virtually proves everything that science presents in the classrooms throughout our educational systems today as being in profound error!    Moreover -- and perhaps even more important -- is the fact that because we culturally build the child's thinking and mindset upon a fraudulent foundation, we inhibit their evolving minds from moving beyond a very counterfeit point in their perception of both themselves, and the world in which they presently dwell.   Modern physicists have proven that the particles are connected in another non-physical dimension that is beyond man's organic vision to detect -- i.e., what in the above is portrayed as the Field.    In the words of Einstein: “We may therefore regard matter as being constituted by the regions of space in which the field is extremely intense… There is no place in this new kind of physics both for the field and matter, for the field is the only reality” (quoted in M. Capek, The Philosophical Impact of Contemporary Physics).   What this confirms is that reality is in the Field that is beyond the organic vision and senses of man -- and the physical world we perceive and interact with, is not only a result of this higher reality that we can't see with our physical eyes, but in many instances is an illusion that is controlled by our predisposed beliefs and philosophical opinions.    Moreover, what this further confirms is that the Darwinist mindset that is presently taught in our schools is not only gravely wrong, but the error which our educational systems is programming young school children with, represents a vision and thought pattern that will inhibit them from understanding man's own higher reality that is manifest in the Field -- or the Etheric realms that the organic senses of the body cannot normally detect.    And herein lies the crux of the problem as seen in the example of our educational systems which will promote grave error -- as seen in the fact that they present a totally false picture of both themselves, and the world -- totally failing to convey to the students that it has already been proven that the mind of man in it’s natural organic state is simply incapable of perceiving the far-reaching ramifications of man's higher reality of mind that is centered in the Etheric Field -- and even less prepared to comprehend the results of the intertwining connections that are maintained not only between individuals and groups of people, but between the past, the present, and future.   What is portrayed in the above is merely science beginning to crack open the door to man's own higher reality -- a reality that he can only begin to grasp, by discarding almost everything that he presently thinks he knows.

That modern physics has proven the vision of the Mystic is a reality that few intellectuals have even begin to come to terms with.  In his 1951 textbook on quantum theory, Bohm offered some interesting speculations on the analogies between the quantum processes and thought processes, thus carrying further the celebrated statement made by the astronomer James Jeans two decades earlier: “Today there is a wide measure of agreement… that the stream of knowledge is heading towards a non-mechanical reality; the universe begins to look more like a great thought than like a great machine”; and the statement by astronomer Arthur Eddington:  “The stuff of the universe is mind-stuff”.   Max Planck who is considered the founder of quantum theory stated: "As a man who has devoted his whole life to the most clear headed science, to the study of matter, I can tell you as a result of my research about atoms this much: There is no matter as such.  All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. This mind is the matrix of all matter."   More recently, cyberneticist David Foster described “an intelligent universe” whose apparent concreteness is generated by cosmic data from an unknowable, organized source.   The reality of the holographic theory says that: “…our brains mathematically construct hard reality by interpreting frequencies from a dimension transcending time and space.   The brain is a hologram, interpreting a holographic universe.” 

What does it mean that the Universe is not concrete matter in the manner that our brains interpret it -- but rather, the Universe is a "Great Thought"?   What does it mean that “…our brains mathematically construct hard reality by interpreting frequencies from a dimension transcending time and space.   The brain is a hologram, interpreting a holographic universe”?   That what we are seeing is a holographic universe that is to a large part created within our own minds, is why the Gospel of Thomas declares: Jesus said, "Recognize what is in your sight, and that which is hidden from you will become plain to you . For there is nothing hidden which will not become manifest."    Which statement provokes the question: If we begin to recognize what is in our sight, what exactly will begin to "...become plain" to our vision and understanding?    In the February 1979 Psychology Today interview with brain scientist Karl Pribram, the world which he attempted to describe confirmed the vision witnessed by the ancient mystics and enlightened wise men -- and when their vision of man's reality is properly understood, confirmed the reality of the Bible that neither true believer nor staunch critic is even prepared to acknowledge and understand -- i.e., Pribram wrote: “It isn’t that the world of appearances is wrong; it isn’t that there aren’t objects out there, at one level of reality. It’s that if you penetrate through and look at the universe with a holographic system, you arrive at a different reality, one that can explain things that have hitherto remained scientifically inexplicable: paranormal phenomena… synchronicities, the apparently meaningful coincidence of events” (see  Illusion ).   And thus, it is this world of illusion that is created by the limitations of each person's own mind that limits the vision and understand of each individual person.

The Holographic Dilemma

When rightly understood, the analogy of Plato's Cave of Illusions presents to us the dilemma of dwelling in a holographic reality -- which means that mankind is portrayed as the prisoners who are shackled in the cave who are only able to see and perceive the shadows that are being danced upon the wall of the cave.    But more importantly, what this means is that the findings of the modern physicist totally supports the analogy of Plato's Cave as seen in the words of Einstein:  "...There is no place in this new kind of physics both for the field and matter, for the field is the only reality”   In the analogy of Plato's Cave, the prisoners are only able to see the shadow-images that are danced upon the wall of the cave -- in much the same way that the physicist portrays the objects we see in the world as a "blemish" that has been created by the intersecting forces of the Field which man can't see with his organic physical senses.     And in the same way that Einstein portrays the source of what we observe in the unseen Field as the only true reality, the analogy of Plato portrays the shadow images being danced upon the walls of the cave as illusion.  

The Holographic Illusion: The Deists claimed that a person could look out at the world and see the signature of Creator-God -- and it is important to recognize that the position of the Deists was confirmed by the biblical authors -- i.e., (5) Jesus said, "Recognize what is in your sight, and that which is hidden from you will become plain to you..." (Gospel of Thomas).  And the Apostle Paul made a parallel statement when he wrote: "...because that which is known about God ...for God made it evident to them.  For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse" (Rom 1:19-20 NAS).   Yet, Atheists and Darwinists reject the position that a person can look out at the world and confirm the higher reality of God.   Why?  When rightly understood, it is the very nature of a holographic reality that gives the illusion of completeness.   If the Holographic Divine Pattern is in fact replicated into each of its parts, then from the perspective of the individual part, one would perceive the illusion of completeness.   In the  the analogy of Plato's Cave of Illusions those who are portrayed as prisoners within the Cave, are all under the illusion that the images which they are seeing are both real and the source of what they are seeing.   Yet, those who understand the properties of a holographic reality, understand that what is being seen is in fact a type of shadow-images that are generated by an unseen source.    The result of the dilemma is seen in the fact that those who are portrayed as prisoners within the holographic reality imagine that they are seeing all that exists -- rather than perceiving that they are merely seeing a sub-reality within an unseen higher reality.  

What this means is that modern physics has provided the answer to the dilemma of Darwinism which was presented in his own words -- i.e., "Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain, and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory" (Charles Darwin, On The Origin Of Species).   These "...intermediate links" do not exist, because the images which we observe with our physical senses are being generated and patterned from a higher unseen holographic reality.   Which means that those scientists and atheists who search the earth for intermediate links -- and/or, deny the existence of any unseen (supernatural) reality that is responsible for creating what we observe in this world -- have not only been proven to be in error, but must be seen as being in complete denial of mankind's true reality.   But more importantly is the fact that those who promote Darwinism are themselves the victims of the inherent appearances of a holographic reality which presents the illusion of completeness to our physical senses.     

The Inherent Limitations Of Science: While modern physicists have proven the validity of the analogy of Plato's Cave, the problem is seen in the fact that the physicist has yet to discover a means to gaze into the unseen Field which is the Source of what we observe with our physical senses -- and perhaps even more importantly, discover a means to enter the reality of the Field and observe higher reality from the perceptive vision of the Source.    And while it is clear that Socrates and his student Plato understood this higher reality that modern science has only just begun to explore, it is difficult to draw out of the Greek Mystery religions the actual means by which they were able to gaze into the unseen worlds that the vast majority of mankind does not even know exists.   Yet, when you begin to truly understand the properties of a holographic universe, only then can you begin to understand the true reality of the scriptures.  

In the analogy of Plato's Cave, it is important to recognize that the images which were being danced upon the walls of the Cave, were in fact shadows that emanated from an unseen reality that remained beyond the vision of the prisoners.   And in much the same way, when the modern physicist portrays what we see as concrete matter as a "blemish" that has been created by the intersecting forces of the Field, it must be realized that these shadow-images were being generated by actual objective realities that are beyond our physical vision and senses, that exist on a higher plane of mind and being.  In the analogy of  Plato's Cave, those who are able to escape the Cave are rejected as madmen when they return to warn the other prisoners of the distorted world of illusions which they have been mesmerized into believing is real.   And while modern physicists have now recognized the validity of this ancient vision of reality which is portrayed in the analogy of  Plato's Cave, they simply have no means to pull back the curtain, and examine the Source which lies beyond the vision of man's organic senses.     Yet, when The author and visionary Philip K. Dick wrote with respect to the original disciples of Jesus that:  "Christ ...taught his followers how to enter the kingdom while still alive, where other mystery religions only bring about amnesis: knowledge of it at the 'other time' in 'the other realm,' not here.  He causes it to come here, and is the living agency to the Sole Good God (i.e. the Logos)" -- that the disciples of Jesus were actually able to enter the causal realm of the (Etheric) Field and observe this world from the perspective of the Source, this represented a fulfillment of both the analogy of Plato's Cave, as well as that of the modern physicist.   Thus, the mystic of the past possessed first-hand knowledge of what the modern physicist speculates about.  

The Holographic Paradox: One of the primary problems encountered when man looks out at the world and attempts to understand what he sees, is in fact presented in the conclusion of astronomer James Jeans when he stated: “...the universe begins to look more like a great thought than like a great machine”; and the statement by astronomer Arthur Eddington:  “The stuff of the universe is mind-stuff”.   And thus the dilemma encountered is seen in the fact that because the Pattern and Cosmology of Mind that has been set before us in the image of the Universe is so enormous -- with each separate image existing as an aspect of the Great Mind -- that you can't "see the forest for the trees" -- which saying is defined as: "It means being so focused on one small part, that you miss the big picture. Being so focused on the trees, that you do not step back and see the big picture which is the forest."  Moreover, because we are virtually blind to the higher reality of the Field, we are therefore unable to see the connectedness of all that exists within the scope of our vision.    And if this were not enough, in not recognizing the Holographic Pattern of the Dualistic Paradoxical Reality of this world, it becomes virtually impossible to see beyond our own inherent carnal and fragmented limitations.   

If it is true as the mystic has witnessed and the modern physicist has confirmed, that the universe is in fact a holographic image of a Great Mind that is spread out across all of Creation -- and that we are unable to perceive this higher reality because we are blind to the underlying Field that connects all the fragmentary pieces of the Great Puzzle -- then what we are is in fact one point of consciousness, or a single neuron, in the Great Mind of the Universe.   And because we see and understand ONLY from the very limited perspective of that single point of consciousness, like the forest for the trees, we fail to perceive the reality of the Great Mind that we are in fact an integral part of.   But the fact that we are a single neuron in the Great Mind of the Universe, presents us with a whole host of problems that few men have even begun to consider -- i.e., that we cannot move beyond our own inherent limitations, until we first embrace and manifest Wholeness within ourselves.   If everything that exists in the holographic pattern of the Macrocosm, also exists within us as the microcosm, then we will remain shackled by our own carnal boundaries until which time we escape the limitations imposed on us by the very construct of the pattern of the Great Mind of the Universe.

In the wisdom of the ancients, what was called the Logos was what can be portrayed as the Mind of God.   Which provokes the question: If the Logos was the Third Reality of the Trinity, then doesn't what is represented by Mother/Father God also have a Mind?   The answer is that, like Mother/Father God, male and female are paradoxical opposites -- and that True Reality can only be found in the Third-Force Balance of the two opposite polarities that form the Divine Pattern that is holograpically replicated into all of Creation.   In the allegorical account of Genesis, before the separation of Adam and Eve, they were perceived as ONE.     

Why Do All Men See Life And The World Differently?

Why Is There Virtually No Agreement Among Countless Opinions?

Why Do Men Read The Same Scriptures, And Each Derives A Totally Different Meaning?

In the allegorical account of the Tower of Babel (see Tower Of Babel), we are presented with the dilemma that everyone not only sees the world from a different perspective, but speaks a language that others do not understand.   The enigma that is presented in the Tower of Babel Syndrome is seen in the reality that "‘If as one people speaking the same language  ...then nothing they plan to do will be impossible for them’” (Gen 11:1-7 NIV).    But to even begin to understand the human condition where virtually every person perceives and understands from a different perspective -- i.e.,"...Come, let us go down and confuse their language so they will not understand each other’” (Gen 11:1-7 NIV) -- in order to achieve the state of Oneness and Wholeness, you must first understand the Enigma Of The Segmented Mind.  (quoting from this link):

The Pattern Of Mind And Being: After eating the forbidden fruit of the Tree of Duality (aka Tree Of Knowledge Of Good And Evil), the statement was made in the allegorical account of Genesis: "The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil. He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat, and live forever" (Gen 3:22-23).   Thus, the objective of life is to become nourished by the fruit of the Tree of Life -- i.e., "'He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. To him who overcomes, I will grant to eat of the tree of life which is in the Paradise of God'" (Rev 2:7).   And respecting the Tree of Life it is written: "Then he showed me a river of the water of life, clear as crystal, coming from the throne of God and of the Lamb, in the middle of its street. On either side of the river was the tree of life, bearing twelve kinds of fruit, yielding its fruit every month; and the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations" (Rev 22:1-2).   With the final statement pertaining to the eating of the fruit of the Tree of Life in order to gain entrance to what is often portrayed as Spiritual Jerusalem in the words: "Blessed are those who wash their robes, so that they may have the right to the tree of life and that they may enter the city by the gates" (Rev 22:14).  

When rightly understood, what is portrayed in the diagram of the Twelve Sphere Tree of Life at the right, is the Pattern of Mind.   But to be nourished by the twelve fruits, one must first achieve a condition of Wholeness.   In the above the comparison is made between the amoeba and man -- wherein, while both can be seen as ONE, it must be understood that the consciousness of man would be extremely complex in comparison to that of the amoeba.  And it is the inner divisions of the mind of man that is responsible for this high-level complexity that elevates man above all the rest of the creatures of the earth.    But, this high-level complexity of the mind of man is built upon both the Holographic Divine Pattern, as well as the great diversity of mind presented when the Tower of Babel Syndrome is rightly understood. 

The great diversity of human thought is achieved through the Law of Opposites.   Not only is each of the outer columns opposite from each other -- as well as the upper and the lower being opposites -- but holographically, the pattern of the twelve is replicated and exists within each of the twelve -- down to what the scriptures portray as the basic of human consciousness as represented in the number 144,000.    And from the perspective of the Cosmic Mind of the Macrocosm, this means that each person who can be portrayed as a Neuron in the Mind of God, is in fact 1/144,000th of the whole -- and in accord with their position within the spectrum of the Pattern of Mind as represented in the Tree of Life, each person is of a unique fragmented vision and understanding of the whole as set forth in the Tower of Babel Syndrome.   And when you further divide this individual state of consciousness across the spectrum of gender, what you are left with is the virtually countless opinions and perceptions of man's reality that are all fragmentary and incomplete at best.   

The Positive Attribute Of A Holographic Reality: While the negative equation a holographic reality imbues the person with the illusion that they perceive the complete picture, on the positive side of the equation is the reality that what you observe in the pattern from a physical perspective, is also on the level of mind, soul and spirit.   Which provides an enlightened understanding of the teaching in the Gospel of Thomas which states: Jesus said, "Recognize what is in your sight, and that which is hidden from you will become plain to you..."   If you can imagine for a moment being on a tour of a Great Cosmic Mind -- wherein, each minute process is expanded and manifested so as to enable it to be closely examined -- and like "the forest for the trees", requires you to take a giant leap back in order to begin to perceive the Whole -- then from a holographic perspective, what you are seeing in the world are all the fragmentary processes that make up your own consciousness, mind and being.   Therefore, all that you perceive and observe in the outer world, is in fact a fragment and pattern of your own mind and being.   All the other people in the outer world are in fact reflecting back to you an aspect of self that you are perceiving from the perspective of the 1/144,000th point within the whole that you were imbued with when you existed as a one-cell embryo at conception.  

Enlightenment Begins With The Process Of Understanding What You See: When you began your journey in this life both the sperm and ovum had to split, in order to become joined to their opposite polarity -- creating the embryo that was comprised of half the genetics of your mother and father.   While in the womb of your mother the embryo grew through the process of the primary cell splitting and expanding, and forming the body of the fetus.   And only when the fetus had matured enough to support life out of the womb, was it born into this world.   But our true self who is our higher soul-self is not imbued with the duality of male or female -- and yet, these male/female polarities are held in balance which enable the soul of each person to be manifest as a Being Of Light.   And from a holographic perspective, what this means is that when we were born into this world as male or female, what we were in fact is the next level of Cosmic Ovum Or Sperm (see The Cosmic Ovum And Sperm).    And in the same way that in accord with the holographic pattern of Creation the divided ovum and sperm of one's mother and father had to be joined together to bring about the embryo that would expand and manifest the physical body which would serve as our vessel in this world, our own expansion of mind and being can only be brought about with the joining of our opposite male or female polarity.   Which means that we are presently dwelling in what can be portrayed as The Womb Of Mother-Earth.  

In the Gospel account of when Jesus came to Nicodemus and proclaimed to him that one must be "born again" to enter the Kingdom of God, the enigma that is presented is the reality that one cannot bring about the process of birth apart from the joining of male and female.   And this fact of reality is confirmed in the 22nd saying of the Gospel of Thomas in the words: Jesus said to them, "When you make the two one, and when you make the inside like the outside and the outside like the inside, and the above like the below, and when you make the male and the female one and the same, so that the male not be male nor the female female...".    Which provokes the age old question: Exactly what does it mean to make the male/female, husband/wife, one flesh?   The Gospel states: "For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh.' So they are no longer two, but one flesh" (Mark 10:7-8).   But in the same way the embryo that is formed from the ovum and sperm must evolve and expand into a living physical vehicle, the embryo that is formed through the union of husband and wife must in the same way evolve into a vehicle on the next plane of man's higher reality.   Much as portrayed in the image on the right.   And while this process is the bases of all Alchemy and Mysticism, it is well within the construct of modern physics to prove the reality of the Divine Pattern as holographically represented in the microcosm of mankind.  

In the parable of the the two sons, the younger son who is often portrayed as the prodigal son, travels into the Far Country and squanders away his (divine) inheritance in what is portrayed as "riotous living".    Which causes him to fall under the control of what is portrayed as the Citizen of the Far Country -- which is often portrayed as the god or ruler of this world.    But what exactly is this inheritance that is being squandered away?   In the mysticism of Pythagoras, Socrates and Plato, and Gurdjieff, all organic life exudes bio-energy or vital life-force.   In the same way that a plant in the process of photosynthesis, exudes oxygen that is then breathed in and utilized by all organic animal life, mankind exudes bio-energy that is then utilized by the organic life of this world as a form of nourishment.    And in the same that in accord with the pattern of Creation, a multitude of sperm or ovum cannot join and form an embryo, it is the interaction of the male chromosomes with the female chromosomes within the joined embryo that cause it to expand and create from itself a fetus within the womb of the mother.   And what this means on the next level of man's holographic reality, is that when the male and female are joined and made what the scriptures portray as "one flesh", that the bio-energy of man and woman interact within the union to initiate and bring about the process of expansion of mind and being.   And it is this condition of absolute balance of man and woman and the positive and negative polarities of Creation that is the basis of the symbol of the Yin and Yang.  

Spiritual Alchemy which is the transformation of the physical into the spiritual, is dependent upon the philosopher's stone which is feminine -- and it is the Union and Oneness of the male and female that is the basis of Higher Consciousness.   But on a cosmic level, it is the interaction of positive/negative as personified in male/female that enables the man and woman not to expel their natural bio-energy off into nature, and instead channel the vital life-force that is portrayed as man's divine inheritance, into the alchemical process of the expansion of mind and being that was an integral part of the original Gospel teachings as presented in the article in the Encyclopedia Britannica under the heading, The History of Christian Mysticism, where it reads: “Although the essence of mysticism is the sense of contact with the transcendent, mysticism in the history of Christianity should not be understood merely in terms of special ecstatic experiences but as part of a religious process lived out within the context of the Christian community. From this perspective mysticism played a vital part in the early church. Early Christianity was a religion of the spirit that expressed itself in the heightening and enlargement of human consciousness” (see The Heightening And Expansion Of Mind).   

In the subheading Gender-Blindness And The Process Of Birth, I quote the book Active Consciousness - Awakening The Power Within, by Amy L. Lansky, where it is stated that: "Biologist Rupert Sheldrake's theory of morphic resonance also depends upon similarity in vibration. Members of the same species, being 'on the same wavelength,' are able to tap into information that pertains uniquely to them. And while members of an entire species might be able to tune into a fairly broad spectrum of frequencies (think of Carl Jung's notion of the collective unconscious that humans supposedly tap into), smaller, more tightly connected groups -- such as members of the same family or loving couples -- resonate in more focused zones of vibration; they have access to their own "private frequency.' In fact, Sheldrake goes even further and suggests that morphic fields can explain how human memory operates. Instead of being stored in our brains, he suggests that memories are stored in the morphic field. Our brains then pick them up via resonance, like radios tuning to their own private stations."
In the diagram on the left, we see the aura-field that encompasses both the man and woman individually, as well as forming the morphic field that has the capacity to manifest and join the two halves in Oneness.   In the diagram on the right we see a pictorial representation of the merger of the bio-energy that when joined, is no longer lost into nature -- but rather, is channeled within the dynamics of the union.    In the subheading entitled The Merger Of Opposites Into One, I demonstrate where the impressions generated by an evolving man and woman are in fact the food portrayed by Gurdjieff who built upon the foundation of Pythagoras and the esoteric Gospel teachings, to demonstrate that it is the merger of the opposite polarity male/female impressions that brings about the expansion of mind and being within the morphic field of the seeker/disciple.  

We must then pose the question: While male and female unions are as common as man and woman, why don't these unions initiate the next stage of birth which the mystics make reference to?   Because the union must not be limited to the physical -- but rather, the dynamic interaction of mind and spirit in a state of absolute harmony that is able to raise the two up to a higher level of being.   Thus, together they must seek to Know Self -- i.e., their true self -- while seeking Truth and the Inner Kingdom.   Why?   The answer is rather simple -- quoting from the subheading The Intuitive Mind Vs The Linear-Rational: In the introduction to the book Secrets of Mary Magdalene, Prof. Elain Pageles writes and quotes the Gospel of Philip: Simultaneously, the Gospel of Philip celebrates Mary Magdalene as manifesting the divine spirit, which this gospel calls the “virgin who came down” from heaven. When Christians spoke of Jesus “born from a virgin,” this author agrees—but refuses to take it literally. So some people, he says, take this literally to mean that Jesus’ mother became pregnant apart from any man, apart from sexual intercourse. But this, he says, is the “faith of fools” who fail to comprehend spiritual matters (although, as we note, it can be seen in the birth narratives offered in the New Testament gospels of Matthew and Luke). Instead, continues the Gospel of Philip, Jesus was born physically, just as all humans, as the son of biological parents. The difference, says the author of this gospel, that he was also “born again” in baptism--born spiritually to become the son of the Father above, and of the heavenly Mother, the Holy Spirit.   That one of the primary objectives of this life is to bring about and achieve the next stage of birth -- a non-physical birth which is allegorically portrayed as a Virgin Birth -- should be of primary importance to all people.   

In the same way that Peter as representing the (male) linear-rational spheres of mind states of the intuitive visions and wisdom of Mary Magdalene:  "...These are certainly strange ideas", it is a fact that it is the lopsided development of what Einstein portrayed as the linear-rational servant that inhibits the development of the intuitive-gift -- i.e., as seen in Einstein's statement that “The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education.”     Without the balanced development of the intuitive, the linear-rational which only senses outwardly, arrives as a point where it becomes what can be portrayed as flat-lined -- which in turn inhibits the further development of the linear rational servant from itself maturing beyond organic limitations.   And herein lies the great obstacle to human development that linear-intellectuals don't at all understand -- i.e., the reality that the linear programming of the mind which is the agenda of our educational systems -- including the reading of books and traditional study -- only serves to inhibit the development of the intuitive spheres of mind -- and it is the lack of balance between the inward looking intuitive and the outward looking linear-rational that inhibits the development of the mind beyond a certain very shallow organic physical level of maturity.    Further, what we are presented with are a number of paradoxes that have confronted man since he first stepped foot on the earth.   Thus, these proverbial questions must be confronted: Is the mind of a child empty?   Or, does a great source of knowledge already exist within the mind of the child that must be tapped into?   Do you instruct a child through rote programming in the manner of our educational systems today?   Or do you guide the child into an environment of self-discovery?

The problem is seen in the fact that the linear-rational servant can only look outwardly -- and not only remains totally ignorant of an inner reality that it is blind to -- but it demands that all of mankind ignore and even reject the higher causal reality that can only be sensed and understood through the development of the intuitive centers of mind.   Like the tip of the proverbial iceberg, what is observed protruding out of the water is very small in relation to the immense body of ice that is beyond man's normal scope of vision lying beneath the water line.   And because our culture and linear learning environment actually inhibits the development of the intuitive, it remains atrophied and latently embryonic and immature.   This is seen in the fact that when the leaders of the Jews (Pharisees) asked Jesus when the Kingdom of God would come upon the earth in the manner that they believed it would, he told them that it would never come upon the earth so as to be seen with their eyes (that look outwardly), because the Kingdom already exists within them (see http://GateOfEden.com ) -- and it is accessed through the development of the intuitive spheres of mind that are positioned to look inwardly -- which then must be balanced with the outward looking rational linear.  

The proper development of the mind to eclipse what can be called organic human limitations, is dependent upon the interaction of the linear and intuitive spheres of mind.   But when the intuitive perception is inhibited, and development is suppressed, even the linear is flat-lined from any development beyond what is portrayed in the Gospels as carnal and restricted consciousness.    The linear mind of man remains limited in its development, because the intuitive remains infantile and shackled in a captive environment where it is only permitted to express itself in linear terms.  While the inward looking intuitive has the potential to access higher consciousness and states of mind and being, it is unable to arise to its intended potential because of the shackles placed upon it by a thoroughly domineering and controlling linear culture.    Like a woman who in many Islamic cultures are forced to dwell in an imprisoned world beneath a Burka -- not permitted to openly express herself except when accompanied by a male relative -- totally deprived of the ability to openly speak on her own behalf -- the natural expression of the intuitive mind has been so impeded by our linear-driven culture, that it has remained undeveloped and unreliable as a resource (see Opening And Unlocking the Mind).   Because the male-linear as portrayed as the portrayal of Peter takes the position that "...These are certainly strange ideas", when the perceptions of the feminine-intuitive is encountered, the merger of impressions can never be brought about -- thus, flat-lining the union at a very low-self carnal perception of man's true reality.