Example Of A

Valid Court Hearing Notice

This is an example of a valid notice of a court hearing.  It is issued by the clerk of the court.   In this case, the summons was issued on November 26th, 2002, and had an original return date scheduled sometime in December of that year.   Because I returned the summons and pleaded Not Guilty within the designated 48 hour timeframe, I was no longer required to appear on the return date of the summons.   Because of the backlog of the court, the period of time between November of 2002, to the first scheduled conference on July 31st, 2004, is normal.  

In the matter of the Liberty plates, a Not Guilty plea was entered into the court record, and having entered my plea, I was no longer required to appear at the return date on the summons which was April 7th, 2004.   But in his letter dated April 23rd, 2004 (see Letter), Deputy Village Attorney J. Barrington Jackson knowingly and willfully lied in an attempt to manipulate the court and deny due process.   Prosecutor Jackson writes: "Because you were attempting to file a motion, the people did not request a warrant of arrest for failure to appear on the return date of April 7, 2004" -- so when Mr. Jackson writes these words, it is in his official capacity as the people's lawyer.   Then Mr. Jackson goes on to write: “Please note that if you fail to appear on one of the two aforementioned dates, a warrant of arrest will issue for the failure to appear on April 7, 2004”.  

When Mr. Jackson wrote these words, he knowingly and willfully lied in order to manipulate the court and deny due process.    Mr. Jackson knows full well that when a defendant such as myself checks the Not Guilty box on the Summons, and returns it to the court, that said defendant is not even supposed to appear on the return date.   The Summons itself reads: "The Court shall then advise the violator by First Class Mail of the trial date."    Even at the time of this writing, the court has yet to schedule a hearing in this matter that I am required to appear at -- which usually takes from one to three years because of court calendar backlog.  

In his position of political power, Mr. Jackson and others like him are accustomed to doing whatever they want without the fear of impingement.   Those familiar with the New York Judiciary have long recognized that the lawyers and officers of the court believe that they are above the law -- and Mr. Jackson's letter is proof positive of this corrupt mindset.   So Mr. Jackson lied, as is commonplace in the judicial system  -- but then he further complicated the matter when he had a warrant issued because of my failure to appear on April 7th, 2004 -- which by law, I was not required to do.   So Mr. Jackson's unlawful actions then became further complicated when he used his position to falsify an action against me where by he filed a complaint with the Nassau County Police to issue a warrant for my arrest (see Warrant).   While this would have its similarities if we were to file a false complaint against another person -- whereby we would then be prosecuted -- this matter is much more severe because Mr. Jackson is an officer of the court and a representative of the people.   So in this instance justice would require Mr. Jackson's immediate suspension from his position, his prosecution, and the removal of his license to practice law in the State of New York -- that is, if Mr. Jackson was an ordinary citizen and did not have a license to lie and totally misrepresent the facts.